|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
   |
Posted - 2009.11.11 12:21:00 -
[1]
yay \o/ back to useless paperweight
why field a ship so expensive just to do slightly above dread damage?
|
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 16:17:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: CCP Nozh
Hey,
The changes on Singularity now, are intentional. The drone control units are however broken at the moment, and are being fixed.
New stats for "Compact Citadel Torpedoes" (launched by fighter bombers):
Explosion Radius: 3500
Explosion Velocity: 45
Damage Reduction Factor: 6.5 (magic number)
Damage: 3600
Super carrier build cost, reduced by 40%. Estimated build cost around 5-6bn.
What we want to create is an anti-capital ship/role, which is more effective than dreadnaughts against moving targets. They can currently reach 7200 DPS (9000 DPS on the Nyx), provided they are fitted for damage and are being supported by fellow pilots. To put this into perspective, the old motherships used to deal 2000 DPS, 2500 DPS (3125 DPS on the Nyx) with drone control units, additionally they've received a huge hit-point boost. The main advantages everyone seems to be overlooking is that Super carriers don't need to commit to a battle like Dreadnaughts nor do they have to be stationary while dealing damage, and of course the fact that they're immune to Electronic Warfare.
By fitting drone control units, pilots are increasing their damage potential greatly while sacrificing survivability. It becomes a hard choice, but being capital ships, they should reach their maximum potential when working together as a team.
There is currently a devblog in the making which should clarify the big picture a bit.
-Nozh
W T F
|
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 17:16:00 -
[3]
ccp it's not funny, you deleted my previous post? lmao
anyway, im not gonna quit my 4 acc's, no point in doing that because I LOVE THIS GAME but honestly, you screwing up TOO MUTCH.
you want constructive feedback? ways to improve?
ROLL THIS CRAP BACK
there. you cant have better feedback than this.
now, fire this moron who came up with this... now!!
|
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 17:31:00 -
[4]
CCP 1 more thing:
if you keep this changes, mark my words: I WILL SELF DESTRUCT.
i do not want to keep paying a account to be OFFLINE all the time, day and night.
i simply refuse to do that anymore.
|
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:20:00 -
[5]
THIS IS RE-TAR-DED
get this rolled back ccp, and while you at it, FIRE THE GUY THAT CAME UP WITH THIS!
|
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 08:38:00 -
[6]
CCP is not right you deleted my posts and other people's post.
We have the right to speak, we have the righ of speech and by deleted our posts entirly, we are denying us of that right.
Even if it is words you dont want to ear.
In short, i dont agree with this changes, i am 100% agaisnt them, the best best constructive feedback i can tell you right about now is that you must reverse this changes.
If you wont reverse them i will self destruct before dominion because i dont want to keep paying 2 more years for a account i simply dont use due to the ship been a piece of junk.
I prefer to collect the insurance while i can
|
The Kan
Gallente
Evolution
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.11.18 21:27:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Jordan Musgrat
If you're intent on allowing supercarriers to dock, at least don't let them rep up in stations, at all. Give us some RP reason like "this station is not equipped to handle the restructuring needs of such a large and complex ship." That will mitigate station docking games alot.
no. no docking at all. period.
15b++ cost
3 drones/fighter per level
no docking
|
|
|
| |
|